Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

Teenage_Mutant_Ninja_Turtles_film_July_2014_poster

Movie: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

Movie Critic: Danushan B

Genre:  Action & Adventure

Rating:  PG-13

Released:  August 8, 2014

Director:  Jonathan Liebesman

Cast:  Megan Fox, Will Arnett, William Fichtner, Alan Ritchson, Noel Fisher, Pete Ploszek, Jeremy Howard
The movie revolves around five main characters: April O’Neil (who is played by Megan Fox) and four ninja turtles that are known as Raphael, Leonardo, Michelangelo, and Donatello in the movie.
Summary:

April O’Neil is a reporter for Channel 6 in New York and aspires to be a great, famed reporter one day. To make this dream possible she does everything in her power to find serious news that will potentially grow famous. In pursuit of this goal, she relentlessly gets herself into problems. In one of her daring attempts to capture thrilling news she inevitably crosses paths with the members of the Foot Clan. The Foot Clan is a criminal network that works against the city, with the goal to overthrow it and gain full control over New York. This is where the Ninja turtles come into play—out of the sewers and into the air—to fight against the Foot Clan and bring peace to the city (quite typical of ‘Super Hero’ movies). Throughout the movie, several ambiguities are created and resolved. Many loopholes remain, possibly to be fixed in the sequel coming up in 2016. Flashbacks are apparent. Pieces connect. Logic falls apart from time to time, but the movie manages to get away with it.
The ninjas gained an upgrade in this reboot movie compared to their cartoon version and the movie released in the 1990s. Some notable features include the turtles being completely bulletproof, being over 6 feet tall and stronger than ever before. (Just look at those muscles!) Shredder, the villain, also gained an
immense upgrade; he’s now made to look more villainous.

green_light

This being a Smoke Free Movies review, I shall discuss the presence or absence of tobacco usage in this movie. And, I’m glad to say the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles went smoke-free throughout the entire duration, which is quite amazing.

Tobacco usage is a health concern among people. Tobacco can be found in several different forms, and one of the notable ones being cigarettes. Now, movies endorse tobacco usage among its audience by displaying it in the hands of its characters, especially in the hands of a character that holds significance—like the protagonist or antagonist. And, this is often done to further develop and display the characters’ personalities. The audience may not easily realize the effect of this endorsement, but these types of pro-smoking promotions in movies do hold the potential to negatively affect the audience, as it makes them more susceptible to the tobacco industry.

Many youths look up to characters in the movie as role models, and try to shadow their footsteps. And if these ‘so called role models’ are seen with cigarettes in their hand, smoking, then it will inevitably
promote cigarettes in the hands of their followers too. Statistics alone shows that 87% of all tobacco impressions are seen through the movies. Fortunately, the TMNT goes smoke-free and sends a message.
If the movie industry followed the lead of these smoke-free movies and stopped placing scenes of tobacco usage in their films, this percentage could be dropped significantly thereby possibly preventing youths from starting smoking in the first place.
Personally, I found it pretty amazing to see a movie that didn’t feature tobacco use in it. It just provided for a better watch. Besides, TMNT has a huge youth fan base and the last thing I would’ve wanted is to see young people starting to smoke just because their favorite ninja turtle smoked a cigarette. That didn’t
happen, so it’s all cool.
Tobacco like I mentioned before is used in movies to further develop a character—to make them appear
more rebellious, cool, or depressed and to add to the mood of the story. TMNT accomplished all of this without having to rely on tobacco. To make the Foot Clan appear more rebellious they were equipped with guns and most members wore masks and dark suits at all times, thereby further distinguishing themselves from the citizens of New York. Instead of giving the protagonists cigarettes in order to express their emotions, the movie displayed their respective emotions through their words, tone of speech and gestures. So all in all, there is actually no need for tobacco in movies.

As TMNT has shown, movies can be made to better express and develop a character’s persona through different means and doesn’t need to rely on tobacco to do this. The special effects found in TMNT are not out of the ordinary, but given the budget they operated with they have done some amazing things. Most commendable are the stunts performed throughout the
movie—with stunts produced by over hundred people. Visual effects throughout the movie were well maintained and the sounds effects used throughout the movie supported and added to the visuals.

I also want to mention the editing that went into this movie. The edits, especially for the fighting scenes, were made at the right time and made the fight scenes more appealing to the eyes. Put this all together with 3D glasses, and you are in for a decent (but not out of the ordinary) watch.
So is it worth watching TMNT? Well, after hearing this somewhat detailed review you might be in a better position to make that decision. As far as recommendation goes, I will recommend this movie to movie watcher of all ages regardless of the fact that it is called “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.” This movie contains most of the elements that will make it a good watch for a teen, family or even a couple. These elements include laughs (thanks to Orange turtle Michelangelo), action scenes, somewhat of an
emotional scenes and a decent plot. And I’ll end this review with Michelangelo’s notable question in the movie (hopefully I’m quoting this correctly):
“Have you seen a cat that plays chopsticks with chopsticks?”

Guardians of The Galaxy

guardians

Movie Critic: Lucy Jing, YATI

Movie Genre: Action & Adventure

Ontario Movie Rating: PG13

Opening Date: August 1st, 2014

Starring: Chris Pratt, Zoe Saldana, Dave Bautista

green_light

Guardians of the Galaxy is based on the Marvel superheroes by the same name and features Peter Quill, a wanted outlaw travelling the galaxy under the name “Starlord.” When he steals a mysterious orb, a large bounty is put upon his head and he ends up in jail. With four other criminals, he escapes and they set out on a journey to discover the secret behind the orb and save the galaxy from unimaginable destruction.Guardians of the Galaxy was a huge success, making $313 million so far. Despite Hollywood’s misguiding tendency to use tobacco to portray characters as rebellious, cool, or powerful, this blockbuster had no tobacco usage. Rather, personalities of characters were better shown through witty dialogue and actions. Personally, knowing some of the negative effects of tobacco, I found the movie to be more enjoyable to watch and I certainly did not miss the too-commonly seen cigarette in the hero/heroine’s hand. In fact, had I not been looking for instances of tobacco use, I would not have noticed the absence of tobacco. This proves how unnecessary Hollywood’s incessant use of tobacco is and how the role that tobacco plays is easily replaced by other means. Guardians of the Galaxy definitely sets a precedent for future blockbusters, sending a message to Hollywood that tobacco use is not part of the formula for a successful movie.More importantly, if the movie industry follows the lead of Guardians of the Galaxy and does not place tobacco in its films, youth will be positively affected. Although many youth may not consciously realize the effect tobacco placement has, it still has an impact on their lifestyle choices when they may try to emulate many of their role models from popular movies. When exposed to more movies like Guardians of the Galaxy, where a character’s persona was developed through his/her actions and words, youth will not have the impression that tobacco is a necessary factor in society. Especially in this movie, where a lot of Peter Quill’s actions are motivated by his passions and good will, youth will grow to understand that the most important aspect of their character is their integrity and ability to fight for what they believe in.Overall, Guardians of the Galaxy was an excellent adaptation of the original Marvel comics, displaying an enthralling combination of humour and sentiment. The movie is also equally engaging for people who have not read the original series. The absence of tobacco makes this movie an excellent choice for moviegoers of all ages looking for a laugh and also a thrill.

Thor: The Dark World

thor

Movie Critic: Sam Graves, City of Hamilton, Unfiltered Facts
Movie Genre: Action & Adventure
Ontario Movie Rating: PG13
Opening Date: November 8th 2013 in Canada
Starring: Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston
Director: Alan Taylor
Tobacco Use: None

green_light
Thor is once again embarking on a journey to save not only Asgard, and the other realms but also his love, Jane Foster. In Thor: The Dark World, Loki returns but is it for the good for Asgard?
I can honestly say Thor: The Dark World was incredible. I went into the movie being concerned that it was not going to live up to my expectations and it blew them out of the water! With all of the superhero movies coming out, the plots of saving of earth can appear similar. The entire film, I was on the edge of my seat trying to guess what was coming. I would recommend this film to not only comic book fans but to everyone; I mean who doesn’t love Chris Hemsworth with long hair!
There was no smoking in this film. The characters whether good or evil, were very realistic without having to use smoking as an aid.
I beseech Thor: The Dark World two big thumbs up for entertainment value and for not have any smoking or tobacco products.

Carrie

carrie

Movie critic: Lacey Davies, City of Hamilton, Unfiltered Facts
Movie Genre: horror
Ontario movie rating: R
Opening date: October, 17, 2013
Starring: Chloë Grace Moretz, Julianne Moore, Gabriella Wilde, Portia Doubleday
Director: Kimberly Peirce
Tobacco use: No

green_light
Carrie is a homely outcast high school girl, who has had telekinetic powers since birth and lives with her over protective and very religious mother. However, when Carrie becomes severally tormented and bullied by her peers she tries to inhibit her powers until she hits her breaking point on prom night; caused by a cruel and unforgiving trick.
Overall I would say that the movie was good, and very enjoyable. In addition, Carrie effectively portrays realistic behavior of paranoia and pain caused by those around her, instantly making it one of my favorite aspects of the movie. People who have been severely bullied throughout their life often have trust issues and are scared of the unknown; this was demonstrated perfectly and had me wanting to reach out and help Carrie throughout the entire movie. Although the pain and frustration that Carrie was going through was demonstrated well, I found that the movie also focused on the mother, and how she was harming herself, way more then it needed to. This movie was a remake of the 1976 Carrie, in which Carrie’s mother was overly protective, and very religious, to the point where she no longer cared about Carrie and was only concerned with her relationship to God, making certain parts of the movie focus more on the mother instead of what Carrie was dealing with. That being said, I would recommend this movie to anyone who likes horror movies and still wants a touch of reality; this movie can really make you realize just how hard a person’s life can be both at home, and at school.
Throughout the movie I realized that the onscreen smoking in 1976 version of Carrie had been removed. The presence and social norms around tobacco use have changed greatly since 1976 and the move remake also evolved to reflect this. I also found it very enjoyable that they did not try to make the main characters seem cool by having them smoke; the guys lacrosse team were just the guys on the lacrosse team, the girls remained in the cool group simply because they were dating guys on the Lacrosse team, not because they smoked.
I give the 2013 version of Carrie 4/5 due to the fact that the movie was 100% realistic but I would have enjoyed it more if they had focused more on how the over protectiveness, and over religious aspects of her mother affected Carrie instead of how it effected the mother allowing her to participate in self harming acts.

Lone Survivor

lonesurvivor

Critic: Alex
Movie genre: War / Drama / Biography
Ontario Movie Rating : 14A
Opening date: January 10th 2014
Starring: Mark Wahlberg, Taylor Kitsch, Eric Bana
Director: Peter Berg
Tobacco Use: None

green_light
Based on the true story and novel by Marcus Luttrell, Lone Survivor recounts “Operation Red Wings”, a military mission by U.S. Navy Seals to assassinate Al Qaeda leader Ahmad Shahd.
Lone Survivor’s true calling card is it’s absolute realism, and unflinching depictions of the true events of four American Navy Seals. As a War movie, there is an expected level of violence, but not so much that it distracts the viewer from the film. The characters are all represented very powerfully, and the results are fantastic. I would recommend this film to anyone who likes true stories, or war films, with the only detractor being the high level of graphic violence which could put some off of the film.
There was tobacco use in the film by an extra. I was very happy however, that none of the main characters in the film used tobacco. This film is a perfect example of how a director can develop masculine, powerful heroes without the use of tobacco products.

American Hustle

americanhustle

Movie Critic: Emily
Movie genre: Crime/Drama
Ontario Movie Rating: 14 A
Opening date: December 2013
Starring: Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Bradley Cooper, Jennifer Lawrence
Director: David O. Russell
Tobacco use: Yes, countless impressions.

tobacco impressions

American Hustle is nominated for Best Picture (although it is not my pick), actor Christian Bale is nominated for Best Actor in a Leading Role for this film and Amy Adams for Best Actress in a Leading Role, among other nominations.
Con artist, Irving Rosenfeld (Christian Bale), along with his partner, Sydney Prosser (Amy Adams) is blackmailed into working for rogue FBI agent, Richie DiMaso (Bradley Cooper) to bring down a string of crooked Politian’s and even the mafia.
The best part of this film was by far the all-star cast. The acting was amazing! The story was a bit slow moving and there wasn’t any particular character that you were rooting for because they were all villains in their own right. However it was exciting to watch the plot unfold and it had its moments of suspense and tension.
What was really disappointing about this film was the amount of tobacco use. Maybe the director was trying to capture the spirit of 70’s or perhaps illustrate the devious nature of the cast, but I feel the smoking was complete unnecessary. The amazing acting done by the entire cast was enough to develop any fictional character convincingly. And the costumes, the hairdos and the set were so well done that excessive tobacco use definitely wasn’t necessary to portray a feeling of 70’s New York. It was also really disappointing to see Jennifer Lawrence smoking throughout the entire film. She is obviously a huge role model to so many young people and it was a shame that she would agree to smoke so much in a youth rated film.
Overall this film was so well made and casted that it did not need tobacco. It did not add at all to the film or the acting.

Frozen

frozen

Movie Critic: Courtney Kerrigan
Movie Genre: Animation, Adventure, Comedy
Ontario Movie Rating: G
Opening Date: November 27th, 2013
Starring: Idina Menzel, Kristen Bell, Josh Gad
Director: Chris Buck, Jennifer Lee
Tobacco Use: None

green_light
Fearless optimist Anna teams up with Kristoff in an epic journey, encountering Everest-like conditions, and a hilarious snowman Olaf in a race to find Anna’s sister Elsa, whose icy powers have trapped the kingdom in eternal winter.
In every Disney Princess movie you expect some singing, however Frozen felt like a full on Broadway performance. It only took a couple of minutes to realize this wasn’t your average Disney Princess movie. Thankfully, Idina Menzel’s (Rent, Glee) voice is pure gold and was something I wouldn’t mind listening to. Aside from the amount of songs, this film was classically Disney funny; there was just the right amount of “cutesy” moments and slapstick humour to amuse all ages. Ask the little boy in our theatre who cracked up every time someone got hurt. Olaf the snowman was an adorable character that kept a somewhat serious movie quite lighthearted. Without giving too much away, the main reason I was impressed with this film is because normally true love is between a prince and princess in Disney movies, however Frozen focused more on the true love between sisters, which is a beautiful message that today’s generation could learn from. Overall, it was a good movie that all children will love.
It was nice to see that there was no smoking in this movie since it is tailored toward a much younger, impressionable audience.

About Time

Abouttime

Movie Critic: Courtney Kerrigan
Movie Genre: Comedy, Drama, Sci-Fi
Ontario Movie Rating: 14A
Opening Date: November 8th, 2013
Starring: Rachel McAdams, Domhnall Gleeson, Bill Nighy
Director: Richard Curtis
Tobacco Use: yes

tobacco impressions
At the age of 21, Tim discovers he can travel in time and change what happens and has happened in his own life. His decisions to make his world a better place by getting a girlfriend turns out not to be as easy as you might think.
I have to say I was a little hesitant about this film, but it is now one of my favorites. This romantic comedy is a film that I have been waiting for in a year of lackluster films. Rachel McAdams once again fits her character role perfectly as a shy bookworm looking for love. She finds it in the goofy but charming Tim, played by Domhnall Gleeson. The pairs on-screen chemistry is evident right from their first meeting and carries the movie along beautifully. It is refreshing to see a film portray healthy, fun relationships. This film is filled with family, love and laughter and makes you appreciate life’s every day, ordinary moments. This film leaves you wanting to treat everyday like it was a gift.
Although none of the characters in the movie smoke, there is one part where they show a picture on the wall of someone using tobacco. I feel that this was completely unnecessary for plot development and did not add to the film in anyway. Would anyone have even noticed if there was no tobacco in the picture on the wall?

Insidious: Chapter 2

insidious

Alexander Scott
Insidious: Chapter 2
Horror
PG-13
Opening Date: Sept 13th
Starring: Patrick Wilson, Rose Byrne
Director: James Wan
Tobacco Use: None

green_light

Insidious: Chapter 2 is a continuation of the 2010 horror film about ghosts and possession, featuring plenty of scares and and overarching feeling of dread. It picks up from where the first film left off, following the plight of a family being plagued by a set of ghosts who want to return from the dead.

What I liked about Insidious: Chapter 2 is that while it is a movie with a very serious story, the film and it’s characters were not afraid to have some fun. It keeps a very straightforward approach to the plot and is always moving between it’s 2 separate sub-plots. On it’s own it was a satisfying modern horror movie that is light on the gore with some creepiness instead. I strongly recommended this movie to anyone who was a fan of the original.

There was no tobacco use in the entire film. The film is for the most part set in the present day, in a household with two children and a senior present and nothing would have been added had any of the characters smoked, so there was no need.

Insidious: Chapter 2 is clearly for fans of the original film, and although it may be frightening for some younger viewers, there is no tobacco use in the film.

Insidious: Chapter 2

Alexander Scott
Insidious: Chapter 2
Horror
PG-13
Opening Date: Sept 13th
Starring: Patrick Wilson, Rose Byrne
Director: James Wan
Tabacco Use: None

Insidious: Chapter 2 is a continuation of the 2010 horror film about ghosts and possession, featuring plenty of scares and and overarching feeling of dread. It picks up from where the first film left off, following the plight of a family being plagued by a set of ghosts who want to return from the dead.

What I liked about Insidious: Chapter 2 is that while it is a movie with a very serious story, the film and it’s characters were not afraid to have some fun. It keeps a very straightforward approach to the plot and is always moving between it’s 2 separate sub-plots. On it’s own it was a satisfying modern horror movie that is light on the gore with some creepiness instead. I strongly recommended this movie to anyone who was a fan of the original.

There was no tobacco use in the entire film. The film is for the most part set in the present day, in a household with two children and a senior present and nothing would have been added had any of the characters smoked, so there was no need.

Insidious: Chapter 2 is clearly for fans of the original film, and although it may be frightening for some younger viewers, there is no tobacco use in the film.